Thursday, December 6, 2012

An actual bookstore? No way...

     In the December issue, The Atlantic published an article written by author Ann Patchett. Patchett was also recently featured on The Colbert Report, where she was able to reach out to millions of viewers nationwide about Parnassus Books, the bookstore she opened in Nashville this year. 
     She and two friends own, manage and maintain the bookstore and the website themselves. They seem to be successful, especially after being aired on television. 
     I loved most of what Patchett had to say; however, I hate how it was written. It was in narrative form. She talked about what inspired her and her process for opening up the store, but there was so much fluff. The beginning was excellent, until she decided to talk about how it all started. I barely made it to the end. It would've been a good story, had it not been written by her. I'm surprised to find myself saying this because I love reading stories in the first-person voice, and I wish other magazines left room for personal stories or even excerpts from books. I find them very interesting. 
     There was one part that stood out to me and some other readers (that I know because I read some of the comments):
(In candor, I should say that Nashville has some truly wonderful used-book stores that range from iconic to overwhelming. But while they play an important role in the cultural fabric of the city, it is a separate role—or maybe that’s just the perspective of someone who writes books for a living.) We have a Barnes & Noble that is a 20-minute drive out of town without traffic, a Books-A-Million on the western edge of the city, near a Costco, and also a Target. Do those count? Not to me, no, they don’t, and they don’t count to any other book-buying Nashvillians with whom I am acquainted.
     Prior to this statement, she said Nashville used to have two bookstores: Davis-Kidd and Borders. They closed down. Their closings inspired the birth of Parnassus. I do not understand how Borders is any different from Barnes & Noble. I also do not understand how Parnassus is any different from Nashville's other used-book stores. I don't like how she added that snooty sentence about how she does not know anyone who counts those other bookstores. I do not think she did a good job explaining how Parnassus Books differs from any other bookstore. Yes, she went into detail about the bookstore from her childhood that she missed dearly, called Mills that "valued books and readers above muffins and adorable plastic watering cans." However, I still do not know how she was creating that effect with Parnassus. She told me without showing me well enough, and that is where she lost me.
      Reading the comments, people like Autumn Dennis voiced that there are tons of independent bookstores in Nashville with "legacies" and a more homey feeling than the hipster Parnassus. A person who goes by the username "therantguy" commented that it would be hard to follow in Patchett's footsteps because she was able to use her name to her advantage. He says other Joe Schmoe's with the same dream wouldn't succeed so easily because they wouldn't be able to get on The Colbert Report or get a story published in a big-time magazine for the nation to see. Other comments opened up my eyes a little bit to the fact that in efforts to talk up her store, she downplayed every other store or means that people use to get their hands on good books. In my head, I thought about how the transition from bookstores to Amazon is a lot like the transition from newspapers/magazines to tablets and smartphones, if not the same thing. There will always be a need for both— a need for the more convenient, digital version and the need for the more tangible, natural and old-school version. Luckily, there is still room in this world for both. Patchett could learn a thing or two from her readers.

People Notice US!

    For years, young adults kept their distance from politics because they always felt like the presidential candidates didn't care about their issues. Their campaigns were mostly aimed at adults and the elderly, and the younger audience couldn't quite grasp the confusing political lingo. As a campaigning strategy, it made sense to focus on the elders, seeming that voters aged 18-25 did not offer much political support.

    However, this election engaged the attentions of young Americans aged 18-29. Twenty-three million Americans in this age group cast a vote. According to the Young Democrats of America (YDA), "Young voter turnout tripled or even quadrupled in many primary states." 

    Why is that? 
    YDA says young voters hit its peak in the 2004 election and has been increasing ever since. I personally thought that this piqued interest was due to social networking.

    Call me a little late, but I just found on the Seventeen magazine website a blog about the election for their readers.
    It is called Electionista Blog, and their writers informed  readers of election news. The blog can be found if you hover your mouse over the "College Life" tab on the menu banner. I know the election took place exactly a month ago from today, but I found the blog about a week ago.

    The writers haven't posted anything since Nov. 7, but looking through all of the posts, you can see how much of an effort they made to get their readers interested in voting. The blog aimed to teach their readers how the election affected women and students specifically. They succeeded in finding real stories from real people that wanted to voice why it is necessary to vote. 
    
    Their "about the blog" section reads: 
Politics can be confusing, overwhelming, and well, a little boring. That's where Electionista comes in! Our Electionista bloggers are here to give you the facts in a straight-forward language that's easy to understand. Keep checking back in to learn about the political front-runners, what they stand for, and what it means for you. You'll also find tons of ways to get involved because your voice matters. Even if you aren't old enough to vote, your voice can still be heard.
     Honestly, I would have never expected this from Seventeen, simply because they are so girly and celebrity-based that it did not make any sense. While reading through the posts that shed light on how each topic related to women and their readers' generations, I realized how remarkable this was. I am not a Seventeen reader. The only things I ever noticed in that magazine were articles about how to tell if a guy likes you and how to put on makeup so it looks like you're not wearing any makeup at all. To see this on their website, I find them to be more sophisticated than I used to. I also really dig how they used the blog to empower women and students all at the same time. 
   
    I kind of wish I had found this sooner so that I could have kept up with the election better. Also, I just finished co-creating a political magazine targeted at young readers. The mission statement read similar to what Seventeen had to say about their blog (without the sass), so I am extremely interested to see how much this blog had an influence on young female voters. Good job, Seventeen. Good job.